A319/A320/A321 NEO Partie 1

Emergency exit access.


Each required emergency exit must be
accessible to the passengers and located where it will afford an
effective means of evacuation. Emergency exit distribution must be as
uniform as practical, taking passenger distribution into account;
however, the size and location of exits on both sides of the cabin need
not be symmetrical. If only one floor level exit per side is prescribed,
and the airplane does not have a tailcone or ventral emergency exit,
the floor level exit must be in the rearward part of the passenger
compartment, unless another location affords a more effective means of
passenger evacuation. Where more than one floor level exit per side is
prescribed, at least one floor level exit per side must be located near
each end of the cabin, except that this provision does not apply to
combination cargo/passenger configurations. In addition—




(a)
There must be a passageway leading from
the nearest main aisle to each Type A, Type B, Type C, Type I, or Type
II emergency exit and between individual passenger areas. Each
passageway leading to a Type A or Type B exit must be unobstructed and
at least 36 inches wide. Passageways between individual passenger areas
and those leading to Type I, Type II, or Type C emergency exits must be
unobstructed and at least 20 inches wide. Unless there are two or more
main aisles, each Type A or B exit must be located so that there is
passenger flow along the main aisle to that exit from both the forward
and aft directions. If two or more main aisles are provided, there must
be unobstructed cross-aisles at least 20 inches wide between main
aisles. There must be—




(1)
A cross-aisle which leads directly to each passageway between the nearest main aisle and a Type A or B exit; and




(2)
A cross-aisle which leads to the
immediate vicinity of each passageway between the nearest main aisle and
a Type 1, Type II, or Type III exit; except that when two Type III
exits are located within three passenger rows of each other, a single
cross-aisle may be used if it leads to the vicinity between the
passageways from the nearest main aisle to each exit.




(b)
Adequate space to allow crewmember(s) to assist in the evacuation of passengers must be provided as follows:




(1)
Each assist space must be a rectangle on
the floor, of sufficient size to enable a crewmember, standing erect, to
effectively assist evacuees. The assist space must not reduce the
unobstructed width of the passageway below that required for the exit.




(2)
For each Type A or B exit, assist space
must be provided at each side of the exit regardless of whether an
assist means is required by § 25.810(a).




(3)
For each Type C, I or II exit installed
in an airplane with seating for more than 80 passengers, an assist space
must be provided at one side of the passageway regardless of whether an
assist means is required by § 25.810(a).




(4)
For each Type C, I or II exit, an assist
space must be provided at one side of the passageway if an assist means
is required by § 25.810(a).




(5)
For any tailcone exit that qualifies for 25 additional passenger seats under the provisions of § 25.807(g)(9)(ii), an assist space must be provided, if an assist means is required by § 25.810(a).




(6)
There must be a handle, or handles, at each assist space, located to enable the crewmember to steady himself or herself:




(i)
While manually activating the assist means (where applicable) and,




(ii)
While assisting passengers during an evacuation.

Beochien a écrit:Ben, c'est la copie conforme de ce que demande MOL et Ryanair à cor et à cri depuis 2 ans !
De plus grandes portes pour accélérer les mouvements et une capa proche des  200 pax !
Bon pour les PB d'évacuation, MOL ... ce n'est pas son PB, c'est un PB de certification !
Ca se passerait tellement mieux avec 2-3 mètres de fuselage en plus, tout ça ...
Le A320 1/2, depuis le temps qu'on en parle  ... 
De plus grandes portes, ça pourrait déjà réclamer 1/2 mètre de plus, X2, ou réduire la capa en PAX si Airbus reste sur la même dimension , alors, pourquoi se priver ... de 2-3  mètres  d'avion !

Si on y arrive, félicitations à Easy Jet, pour avoir forcé la main d'Airbus, et dans le bon sens !

JPRS

Admin a écrit:Je ne vois pas trop comment ils vont faire sur l'A320 si ils passent 192 PAx pour les sorties sans tout avoir à reprendre