par Beochien Dim 23 Juin 2013 - 0:14
Bonne nuit !
Une bien surprenante déclaration (s) de McActor , le Chairman de Airbus America !
Les KC 46 , ne vont pas si bien que ça ... Airbus ne désespère pas qu'un jour ....
Ce qui m'interpelle, la suppression des reverses sur le KC 46 pour gagner du poids ... holé, retour au bon temps des caravelles, tout sur les freins, et on croise les doigts !
Bon, il y va à la hache, et manie tout aussi bien la politique le McActor !
Noté que Mobile pourrait ne pas rester figé sur les A320 ...
Alors, le résiduel des A330 ou les A350-1000 ??
-------- Le lien et des extraits du Seattle Times, par Dominic Gates---------
http://blogs.seattletimes.com/boeing/2013/06/19/airbus-u-s-chief-mcartor-has-some-startling-ideas/
McArtor predicted that in 10 years Airbus will build “more than just A320s in Mobile.”
He said that the widebody A330 could still be in production then, and could be built in Mobile, perhaps as a military conversion to a freighter – or a tanker.
---------------------
McArtor insisted he’s serious in thinking “we’ll get another shot at the tanker business some years out.” How?
“It depends how successful Boeing is. If they can’t perform the mission or solve the weight problem, we may be invited back faster than you think,” he said.
Asked what “weight problem” he meant, McArtor scoffed at the fact that Boeing is not putting thrust reversers on its KC-46A tanker. “That’s one indication” of a drive to save weight, he said.
Thrust reversers are part of the engine system that the pilot activates on landing to help brake the plane so it can land in a shorter distance.
A source familiar with the tanker proposal who asked not to be named confirmed that the Boeing KC-46A tanker has no thrust reversers, but added that they were not part of the Air Force requirement.
McArtor laughed at the notion of leaving out thrust reversers because it would mean the tanker needs a longer landing strip. He compared it to a car without brakes.
JPRS